ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN SMALL PLANTATION BUSINESS (CASE STUDY: SUMBER TANI)
Ria Alisa
Manulang1, Aurik Gustomo2
Master of Business
Administration Institut Teknologi
Bandung
Email: ria_alisa@sbm-itb.ac.id1,
aurik@sbm-itb.ac.id2
Abstract
The agricultural sector, specifically the palm oil
industry, is a significant contributor to Indonesia's GDP. South Sumatera is
one of the largest producers of Indonesia's total palm oil production. The
purpose of this study was to determine how the influence of Employee
Motivation, Compensation, and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance
at Sumber Tani as one of smallholder plantations in
South Sumatera, namely Sumber Tani. Sumber Tani experienced challenges related to employee
performance which led to the non-achievement of harvesting targets and decline
in sales. This research uses a quantitative approach with research methods,
namely multiple regression analysis and importance performance analysis. The
source of this research uses primary data with data collection using a
questionnaire. The sample in this study were 41 workers at Sumber
Tani using saturated sampling techniques. The results of hypothesis testing
show that there is a positive and significant influence simultaneously and
partially between Employee Performance, Compensation, and Organizational
Commitment on Employee Performance, where these variables have an influence of
91.5% on Employee Performance. The results of importance performance analysis
found that Compensation is the priority variable for improvement. Recommended
strategies to improve Compensation at Sumber Tani are
to conduct a salary survey, determine the amount of salary based on the salary
survey, and provision of incentives.
Keywords: Employee Motivation, Compensation, Organizational
Commitment, Employee Performance
Introduction
The agricultural sector plays an
important role in economic activities in Indonesia, this can be seen from the
Agricultural Sector which has contributed 11.8 percent to the total national
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (Agriculture Census, 2023). Currently,
plantations, especially palm oil, is the most strategic agricultural subsector
and provide a large contribution to Indonesia's Gross Domestic Income (GDP)
because they are the mainstay export commodity of the Agricultural Sector.
Based on statistics provided by the Badan Pusat Statistik
(BPS), Indonesia's export value of Crude Palm Oil (CPO) has reached US$29.62
billion in 2022. The data shows that South Sumatra is one of the largest palm
oil producing provinces in Indonesia in 2021 based on the plantation statistics
report issued by the Direktorat Jenderal
Perkebunan. From a collection of statistical data issued by the Directorate
General of Plantations in several years shows that the total land area in South
Sumatra from 2017 to 2023 has fluctuated but tends to stabilize in the range of
0.56 million hectares each year. Furthermore, the total production in each year
also fluctuates with an average total produced annually of 1.92 million Kg of
oil palm. Based on all the statistic data related to
the general condition of palm oil management in Indonesia above, it shows that
the palm oil industry has the opportunity to contribute greatly to increasing
Indonesia's economic growth. The research by (Bintariningtyas & Juwita, 2021) shows that the plantation business
plays an important role in providing employment, especially in rural areas
where many plantations are located. This has a positive impact on poverty
alleviation and local economic development. By providing millions of jobs, the
palm oil industry is the backbone of many communities in Indonesia and helps
improve people's lives. In addition, the industry also drives the growth of
related sectors, such as transportation and logistics, as well as processing
industries that produce various palm oil derivatives. Despite challenges
related to sustainability and environmental impacts, the role of the palm oil
industry remains a key component in the economies of local communities where
oil palm plantations are located in Indonesia.
Sumber Tani is a small plantation business
that produces and sells oil palm fruits in one of the districts in South
Sumatra. Sumber Tani as one of the business ventures
in the field of smallholder plantations has the potential to contribute more to
palm oil production and grow bigger in the South Sumatera. Sumber
Tani can also be a means of providing employment for local communities around
the oil palm plantation area. This is evidenced by the fact that all employees
working at Sumber Tani are from the immediate area
around its plantations. However, in the implementation of its operational
activities in the plantation sector, Sumber Tani
faces major challenges in terms of human resources due to various factors. The
demanding nature of work in plantations, coupled with the intensive physical
tasks of maintaining and harvesting oil palm fruits, places a great burden on
the workforce. Thus, understanding and addressing the human resource challenges
is critical for Sumber Tani to improve its human
resource management to achieve operational efficiency, optimize yields, and
maintain its contribution to the rapidly growing palm oil industry in South
Sumatra. Based on interview with the business owner and several employees on
the declining sales at Sumber Tani identified key
issues linked to employee performance. Problems such as tardiness, absenteeism,
and sudden resignations were noted, leading to delayed harvests and reduced
fruit quality. Focusing on the longest-tenured workers, the research revealed
central concerns around motivation, commitment, and inadequate compensation.
According to (Intan
& Maulana, 2023), motivation is an aspect of
psychology that has a huge influence on employee performance. As stated by (Omollo,
2015), motivation plays a crucial role in
ensuring the success and longevity of an organization by fostering a strong
work ethic and resilience. (Maduka
& Okafor, 2014) contend that motivation involves
stimulating behavior, sustaining behavioral advancement, and directing specific
action behavior. Various factors can impact employee motivation, as stated by (Wiliandari,
2014). These factors include family and
cultural influences, self-perception, gender, recognition and achievement,
goals and aspirations, learning capacity, employee circumstances, environmental
conditions, dynamic elements in the workplace, and leadership initiatives to
motivate employees. Indicators of Employee Motivation according to (Mangkunegara,
2017) are responsibility, work
achievement, opportunity for advancement, and work recognition.
Compensation as defined by (Murjanah
2019), encompasses all forms of payments including cash, physical commodities,
and intangible benefits, that employees receive in exchange for their services
rendered to the organization. The impact of compensation on employee motivation
and performance levels is important and can be either direct or indirect (Erwinsyah,
2015); (Handayani,
2018). According to (Mujanah,
2019), several things that must be
considered by a company in determining compensation are attractive,
competitive, motivative, and reasonable.
Organizational commitment refers to
an individual's unwavering devotion and wholehearted dedication to the company.
It entails a continuous effort to actively contribute to the prosperity and
progress of the organization (Luthans
& Doh, 2018). According to (Sakban
et al., 2019), organizational commitment is
characterized by a deep belief in the organization's mission, active
involvement in work responsibilities, and a strong sense of loyalty and
affection towards the organization as a source of sustenance and employment.
According to (Samsuddin,
2018), organizational commitment can be
defined as a pledge or agreement to fulfil certain obligations. According to (Allen
& Meyer, 1990), there are three separate dimensions
of organizational commitment, namely affective commitment, continuance
commitment, and normative comnmitment.
Employee performance refers to the
execution of job tasks, including the methods employed and the outcomes
achieved, with the aim of attaining organizational objectives (Chao
et al., 2013). (Robbins
et al., 1919) defines performance as the outcome
that individuals achieve in their work based on specific job-related criteria. (Robbins
et al., 1919) defines performance indicators as
tools used to assess the level of employee performance including quality of
work, quantity, timeliness, effectiveness, and independence.
Based on this description, this study
aims to determine how the influence of Employee Motivation, Compensation, and
Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance at Sumber
Tani.
The results of research conducted by (Hasibuan
& Silvya, 2019) to examine the effect of work
discipline and motivation on employee performance at PT. Mewah
Indah Jaya Binjai show that partially and
simultaneously it is known that work discipline has a positive and significant
effect on employee performance at the company. Other research was also
conducted by (Ratnasari
et al., 2020) to analyze the effect of individual
characteristics, work environment, organizational climate, motivation, and
compensation on employee performance on all permanent employees of PT Matahari Department Store Nagoya Hill Batam as many as 198
people showed one of the results, namely motivation has a positive and
significant effect on employee performance. Therefore, it is hypothesize
that:
H1 = Employee motivation is
significantly and positively influence employee
performance.
A study conducted by (Sinaga
& Hidayat, 2020) aims to determine the effect of
motivation and compensation on employee performance. This research was
conducted on 65 employees of PT Kereta Api Indonesia Rantau Prapat
branch with saturated sampling. The results of this study show one of the
results that compensation has a positive and significant effect on employee
performance. Meanwhile, similar research was also conducted by (Nugraha
& Tjahjawati, 2017) to determine the effect of financial
compensation on employee performance in Cargill Tropical Palm (ISK Lake View
Estate) of West Kalimantan. The sample in this research is all of Cargill
Tropical Palm (ISK Lake View Estate) field employees as many as 110 people used
as material of analysis and the result is that there is a significant and
positive influence between compensation and employee performance. Therefore, it
is hypothesize that:
H2 = Compensation is significantly
and positively influence employee performance.
The study by (Purwanti
& Sutia Budi, 2021) aims to analyze the effect of
organizational commitment and organizational culture on employee performance.
The results showed in the f test (simultaneous) that organizational commitment
significantly simultaneously affects employee performance with a sig value. F
0,000 < 0,05, while organizational culture has a significant effect on
employee performance with a sig value. 0,000>0,05. (Ghorbanpour
et al., 2014) also found that organizational
commitment has a notable positive impact on employee performance, specifically,
normative commitment had the most pronounced influence on average performance,
surpassing both affective commitment and continuation commitment. Therefore, it
is hypothesize that:
H3 = Organizational commitment is
significantly and positively influence employee
performance.
Method
The research design plays a vital
role in providing an organized and methodical approach to the research process.
According to (Sugiyono,
2018), quantitative research is a
scientific approach that focuses on carefully analyzing a specific issue inside
a phenomen and identifying probable connections or
interactions between variables that are relevant to particular concerns. The
researcher in this study has analyzed employee performance specifically within
the setting of Sumber Tani. This study employs a
quantitative methodology, utilizing descriptive and verification analyses as
research methodologies. Data analysis is conducted by multiple regression
analysis including simultaneous significat test
(F-Test) and partial hypothesis test (t-Test) and importance performance
analysis (IPA). This research relies on primary data obtained through the
questionnaire distribution for data collecting. The participants in this study
consisted of 41 employees from Sumber Tani, selected
using saturated sampling procedures. All analysis processing using the help of
statistical data processing program SPSS 23.
Result and Discussion
Table 1 of Validity and Reliability
Test Results
Variable |
No |
r
Count |
r
Table |
Description
|
Alpha Cronbach |
Description |
Employee Motivation (X1) |
1 |
0,807 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
0,930 |
Reliable |
2 |
0,703 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
3 |
0,757 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
4 |
0.838 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
5 |
0,842 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
6 |
0,705 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
7 |
0,789 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
8 |
0,688 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
9 |
0,745 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
10 |
0,751 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
11 |
0,811 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
Compensation (X2) |
1 |
0,805 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
0,929 |
Reliable |
2 |
0,850 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
3 |
0,813 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
4 |
0,846 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
5 |
0,759 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
6 |
0,709 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
7 |
0,855 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
8 |
0,753 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
9 |
0,803 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
Organizational Commitment (X3) |
1 |
0,841 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
0,896 |
Reliable |
2 |
0,816 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
3 |
0,685 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
4 |
0,729 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
5 |
0,753 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
6 |
0,685 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
7 |
0,850 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
8 |
0,722 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
Employee Performance (Y) |
1 |
0,744 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
0,932 |
Reliable |
2 |
0,725 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
3 |
0,776 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
4 |
0,800 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
5 |
0,770 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
6 |
0,788 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
7 |
0,779 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
8 |
0,738 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
9 |
0,866 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
10 |
0,713 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
|||
11 |
0,796 |
0,3081 |
Valid |
According to (Sugiyono,
2017), the validity of research results is
established when there are connections between the collected data and the data
associated with to the researched object. While according to (Sanusi,
2014) study, reliability is a term used to
evaluate the consistency of outcomes when the same individual uses it at
different periods, or if it is used by multiple individuals at the same or
different times. In table above
there is a validity index value on each statement item of the Employee
Motivation, Compensation, Organizational Commitment, and Employee Performance
variables as measured by the correlation value (r-table) which has above the
critical value (0.3081), so each variable question is declared valid. While the
reliability value of the statement items on the questionnaire of the four
variables above shows the Cronbach alpha value > 0.6 these results indicate
that the statement items on the Employee Motivation, Compensation,
Organizational Commitment and Employee Performance variables in the research
instrument are said to be precise, stable and reliable as variables in a study.
Table 2 of Regression Coefficient
Results
Coefficientsa |
||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
.552 |
1.612 |
|
.342 |
.734 |
X1 |
.321 |
.109 |
.316 |
2.945 |
.006 |
|
X2 |
.476 |
.170 |
.394 |
2.797 |
.008 |
|
X3 |
.393 |
.191 |
.281 |
2.059 |
.047 |
|
a.
Dependent Variable: Y |
According tor
(Siregar,
2013), multiple linear regression is
developed as simple linear regression, which is a tool equation tor predict future demand based on prospective data and tor determine the effect of one or more independent
variables (independent) on dependent variable (dependent). In table above, the beta coefficient
is obtained for each variable so that a multiple linear regression equation can
be formed as follows:
Y = β0 + β1X1
+ β2X2 + β3X3+e
Y = 0,552 + 0,321 (X1) +
0,476(X2) + 0,393 (X3)
Description :
Y =
Emploryee
Performance
β0 =
Regressiorn Cornstant
X1 = Employee Motivation
X2 = Compensation
X3 = Organizational Commitment
β1,É βi =
Corefficient
Beta
e =
Disruptive Factorrs
Table 3 of Simultaneous
Test Results
ANOVAa |
||||||
Model |
Sum of
Squares |
Df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
1 |
Regression |
2346.690 |
3 |
782.230 |
132.484 |
.000b |
Residual |
218.461 |
37 |
5.904 |
|
|
|
Total |
2565.151 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Y |
||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), X3, X1, X2 |
According to (Ghozali,
2013), the F statistical test is used to
determine if the independent or dependent variables included in the model
collectively affect the dependent or independent variable. Based orn the table
above, the Fcount value orf
132,484 is greater than the Ftable value orf
2,859 besides that it is knorwn tor be sig. (0.00)
is less than the significant level (5%) sor H0
is rejected. Thus the regression model means, so that
simultaneously there is a significant influence between Employee Motivation,
Compensation, and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance on
Employees at Sumber Tani.
Table 4 of Partial Test Results
Koefisien Regresi |
t hitung |
t Tabel |
Sig. |
Keterangan |
|
X1 ˆ Y |
0,321 |
2,945 |
2,026 |
0,006 |
|
X2 ˆ Y |
0,476 |
2,797 |
2,026 |
0,008 |
|
X3 ˆ Y |
0,393 |
2,059 |
2,026 |
0,047 |
|
(Sanusi,
2014) argues that hypothesis testing or
significance testing of each regression coefficient is necessary to ascertain
the significance of the effect of each independent variable (X1, ....) on the
dependent variable (Y). In the first hypothesis (H1), it is
obtained that the tcorunt value of 2.945 is greater than the ttable of 2.026 and
sig. (0.006) is smaller than the significance level (0.05) so that H0 is rejected,
meaning that there is a positive and significant influence between Employee
Motivation on Employee Performance, with a positive regression coefficient
which indicates that the better the Employee Motivation in Sumber Tani, the
better the Employee Performance will be, and vice versa the worse the Employee
Motivation in Sumber Tani, the worse the Employee Performance will be.
In the second hypothesis (H2), it is found that the tcorunt value
of 2.797 is greater than the ttable of 2.026 and
sig. (0.008) is smaller than the significance level (0.05) so that H0 is rejected,
which means that there is a positive and significant influence between
Compensation on Employee Performance, with a positive regression coefficient
which indicates that the better the Compensation at Sumber Tani, the better the
Employee Performance will be, and vice versa, the worse the Compensation at
Sumber Tani, the worse the Employee Performance will be.
In the third hypothesis (H3), it is found that the tcorunt value
of 2.059 is greater than the ttable of 2.026 and
sig. (0.047) is smaller than the significance level (0.05) so that H0 is rejected,
which means that there is a significant influence between Organizational
Commitment on Employee Performance, with a positive regression coefficient
which indicates that the better the Organizational Commitment in Sumber Tani,
the better Employee Performance will be, and vice versa, the worse the
Organizational Commitment in Sumber Tani, the worse Employee Performance will
be.
Table 5 of
Correlation Test Results
Model Summaryb |
||||
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R
Square |
Std. Error
of the Estimate |
1 |
.956a |
.915 |
.908 |
2.42989 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), X3, X1, X2 |
||||
b. Dependent Variable: Y |
Based on the value of R from the table above, the
coefficient of determination aims to measure the ability of the model to
explain the variation of the dependent variable by the independent variable.
According to (Priyatno, 2016) the coefficient
of determination is used to determine the percentage of contribution of the
influence of the independent variables together on the dependent variable. The
coefficient of determination is obtained from the results of the calculation as
follows:
The results of the above calculation of the coefficient
of determination of 91.5% indicate that Employee Motivation, Compensation, and
Organizational Commitment have an influence on Employee Performance by 91.5%
while the remaining 8.5% is influenced by other factors not examined.
The
Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method allows firms to assess the
significance and effectiveness of service features as perceived by consumers (Murdy
& Pike, 2012). In this research, the Importance
Performance Analysis method is used to determine the position of each
independent variable that has been explained based on data processing, the
level of importance data comes from the results of the beta coefficient of each
independent variables on the results of multiple regression analysis and the
performance is from the average of the average
performance level scores from the total actual score in each independent
variables on the questionnaires.
Figure
of Importance Performance Matrix
Based on the calculations that have
been carried out to create a Figure of Importance Performance Matrix in the
importance performance analysis, the variable included in the first quadrant
that is a priority for improvement is the Compensation variable obtaining a
value of 3.379 at the performance level and 0.476 at the importance level. The
Compensation variable is are considered important to employee (above average),
but in reality the existing performance of this
variable is not in line with expectations (below average).
Recommendation of strategies for compensation improvement:
1.
Conducting the Salary or
Wage Survey
A salary survey is an
important part that needs to be done in determining employee salary standards.
This activity is carried out to realize external justice which is an important
factor in determining and planning the salary structure. Salary surveys can be
carried out in various ways ranging from obtaining salary levels applied by
other companies to making formal questionnaires (Mujanah,
2019).
2.
Determining the Salary
Amount Based on Salary or Wage Survey
According
to (Mujanah, 2019),
there are several indicators that can be used to determine the amount of salary
received by employees, namely in determining the amount of salary received by
employees, namely Time-Based Pay,
Competency-Based Pay or Skill-Based Pay, Seniority-Based Pay
Job-Based Pay, and Work
Perfomance-Based Pay.
3.
Provision of Incentives
According
to (Rivai 2004: 384), incentives are a form of payment that is linked to
performance, as a distribution of benefits for employees. Likewise, according
to (Mangkunegara, 2017),
incentives are a form of motivation expressed in the form of money on the basis
of high performance and are also a sense of recognition from the organization
of employee performance and contribution to the organization (company).
Conclusion
After analyzing the data and
discussing Employee Motivation, Compensation, and Organizational Commitment as
factors that affect Employee Performance at Sumber
Tani, the following conclusions can be drawn:
1. Employee Motivation, Compensation,
and Organizational Commitment partially and simultaneously have a positive and
significant influence on Employee Performance at Sumber Tani. Employee
Motivation, Compensation, and Organizational Commitment variables influence the
Employee Performance by 91.5% while the remaining 8.5% is influenced by other
factors not examined.
2. Variable that is prioritized for
improvement of Employee Performance at Sumber Tani is
Compensation.
3. Recommendation of strategies to
improve Compensation at Sumber Tani are to conduct a
salary survey, determine the amount of salary based on the salary survey, and
provision of incentives.
REFERENCES
Allen, N. J., &
Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance
and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational
Psychology, 63(1), 1Ð18.
Bintariningtyas, S., & Juwita, A.
H. (2021). Perkebunan kelapa sawit dalam pengentasan kemiskinan di provinsi
kalimantan tengah Oil palm plantations in poverty alleviation in the province
of Central Kalimantan. 23(2), 199Ð205.
Chao, M.-C., Jou, R.-C., Liao, C.-C.,
& Kuo, C.-W. (2013). Workplace Stress , Job Satisfaction , Job
Performance , and Turnover Intention of Health Care Workers in Rural Taiwan.
1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539513506604
Erwinsyah, E. (2015). Pengaruh
kompensasi terhadap motivasi kerja karyawan PDAM Tirta Musi Palembang. Jurnal
Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, 6(1), 13Ð17.
Ghorbanpour, Z., Dehnavi, H. D.,
& Heyrani, F. (2014). Investigating the effect of organization commitment
on performance of auditors in the community of certified accountants. Interdisciplinary
Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(10), 199Ð209.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis
Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS 21. Edisi 7, Penerbit Universitas
Diponegoro, Semarang. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128,
1547Ð1584.
Handayani, S. (2018). Pengaruh
Kompensasi Finansial Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Harian Lepas Di Dinas Lingkungan
Hidup Dan Kebersihan. 8(01), 12Ð20.
Hasibuan, J. S., & Silvya, B.
(2019). Pengaruh disiplin kerja dan motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawan. Prosiding
Seminar Nasional USM, 2(1), 134Ð147.
Intan, A., & Maulana, Z. (2023). Hubungan
Antara Motivasi Kerja Dengan Kinerja Karyawan Pada Pt Perkebunan Nusantara X
Kebun Ajong Gayasan Jember The relationship between work motivation and
employee performance at Pt Perkebunan Nusantara X Kebun Ajong Gayasan Jember
Abstrak. 10(03), 628Ð640.
Luthans, F., & Doh, J. P. (2018).
International management: Culture, strategy, and behavior. McGraw-Hill.
Maduka, C. E., & Okafor, O.
(2014). Effect of Motivation on Employee Productivity: A Study of Manufacturing
Companies in Nnewi. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research,
2(7), 137Ð147.
Mangkunegara, A. P. (2017). Evaluasi
Kinerja SDM (Edisi Kede). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mujanah, S. (2019). Manajemen
kompensasi. CV. Putra Media Nusantara (PMN).
Murdy, S., & Pike, S. (2012).
Perceptions of visitor relationship marketing opportunities by destination
marketers : An importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 33(5),
1281Ð1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.11.024
Nugraha, A., & Tjahjawati, S.
(2017). Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. 3(3),
24Ð32.
Omollo, P. A. (2015). Sci-Hub | Effect
of motivation on employee performance of commercial banks in Kenya: A case
study of Kenya Commercial Bank in Migori County. International Journal of Human
Resource Studies, 5(2), 87 | 10.5296/ijhrs.v5i2.7504. International Journal
of Human Resource Studies, 5(2), 87Ð103.
Priyatno, D. (2016). Belajar alat
analisis data dan cara pengolahannya dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Gava Media,
143Ð150.
Purwanti, N. D., & Sutia Budi, S.
E. (2021). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap
Kinerja Karyawan Pada Bank BRI Randublatung 2. ITB Ahmad Dahlan Jakarta.
Ratnasari, S. L., Buulolo, M., &
Nasrul, H. W. (2020). Analisis Karakteristik Individu, Lingkungan Kerja,
Iklim Organisasi, Motivasi, Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. 2(0411).
Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A.,
Angelica, D., & Resthi, W. (1919). Perilaku Organisasi I: Organizational
Behavior. -.
Sakban, S., Nurmal, I., & Ridwan,
R. Bin. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Journal Of Administration and
Educational Management (ALIGNMENT), 2(1), 93Ð104.
Samsuddin, H. (2018). Kinerja
Karyawan tinjauan dari dimensi gaya kepemimpinan, budaya organisasi dan
komitmen organisasi. Sidoarjo: Indomedia Pustaka.
Sanusi, A. (2014). Metodologi
penelitian bisnis.
Sinaga, T. S., & Hidayat, R.
(2020). Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kompensasi terhadap kinerja Karyawan pada PT.
Kereta Api Indonesia. Jurnal Ilman: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 8(1),
15Ð22.
Siregar, S. (2013). Metode
penelitian kuantitatif: dilengkapi dengan perhitungan manual & SPSS.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode
Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode
Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wiliandari, Y. (2014). Rancangan
pelatihan dan pengembangan sdm yang efektif. Society, 5(2),
93Ð110.